Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Housing Production Falls 6.5% in May; Single-Family Permits Rise

single-family-homes-under-construction-and-completed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

Declines in both single- and multifamily starts pushed nationwide housing production down 6.5% in May to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of just over 1 million units, according to newly released figures from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Census Bureau. However, single-family permits, which can be an indicator of future building activity, rose 3.7%.

Single-family housing starts dipped 5.9% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 625,000 units in May. On the multifamily side, production fell 7.6% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 376,000 units.

“The encouraging news is that single-family permits are up by almost 4%,” said NAHB Chief Economist David Crowe. “The modest increase is evidence that builders expect continued release of pent-up demand and a gradual expansion of the housing market. We are still forecasting a 12% increase in total housing starts for the year.”

Combined single- and multifamily production was down in most of the country. The Northeast, the Midwest and the West posted respective losses of 25.2%, 16.5% and 16.3%. The one exception was the South, which registered a 7.3% gain.

Issuance of building permits registered a 6.4% decline to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 991,000 units in May. This was due entirely to a decrease in the multifamily sector, where permits registered a 19.5% loss to 372,000 units. Single-family permits increased to 619,000 units.

Come back tomorrow to www.AshfordCP.com/blog  where Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

http://nahbnow.com/2014/06/housing-production-falls-6-5-in-may-single-family-permits-rise/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=mmb0623

 

Record-breaking $147 million home once sold for $120

That’s an appreciation of 122,499,900%!

Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use. After plunging throughout 2012 and for much of 2013.
—-
The most expensive home in the history of the United States once sold for $120. Not $120 million. 120 dollars.

The record-breaking sale occurred last month when hedge fund manager Barry Rosenstein bought a property that can only be described as a “spread.”

Rosenstein bought the property in the East Hamptons in New York for $147 million. According to an article from Forbes, the property once sold for $120.

Admittedly, the $120 sale did take place in 1901, but that’s still an astronomical amount of appreciation for the value of the property. In fact, it’s an appreciation of 122,499,900%. That’s 122 million percent!

The property’s history is particularly fascinating. According to the Forbes article:

The property’s roots trace all the way back to Lion Gardiner, who in 1639 and with a grant from King Charles I, settled ”Gardiners Island” in the bay off Long Island’s South Fork, creating the first English colonial settlement in what would become New York State. Gardiner purchased the property from the Montaukett Indians for “one large dog, one gun, some powder and shot, some rum and several blankets, worth in all about Five Pounds sterling.”

In its time, the property has been owned by a group that included: Pan Am founder Juan Trippe; insurance salesman and tennis promoter Julian Myrick; grandfather of Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis; James Lee; Howard Dean, grandfather of the former presidential candidate; and A. Wallace Chauncey.

In recent years, Christopher H. Browne, the value investor who was managing director of New York investment firm Tweedy, owned the property until his death in 2009. He purchased it for $13.4 million in 1996. He left the property to his partner Andrew Gordon, who died of cancer in 2013.

Rosenstein purchased the property for nearly $115 million more than Browne paid for the property in 1996. And for nearly $147 million more than David Gardner, Lion’s descendant, paid for it in 1901.

And we complain when homes only appreciate by 5%.

June 20, 2014
Ben Lane – http://www.housingwire.com/blogs/1-rewired/post/30398-record-breaking-147-million-home-once-sold-for-120
Come back tomorrow to www.AshfordCP.com/blog  where Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

Housing inventory jumps 11.8% but first-time buyers still locked out

Affordable home inventory shrinking further

locked_house

After plunging throughout 2012 and for much of 2013, and rising only modestly through the beginning of this year, the inventory of all for-sale homes nationwide spiked in May, jumping 11.8% year-over-year according to Zillow (Z).

But most of those gains in inventory were made among homes priced in the middle and top one-third of home values, according to Zillow Real Estate Market Reports.

The number of homes available for sale in the most affordable price bracket, those homes most sought by first-time homebuyers, fell year-over-year in 28 of the nation’s largest metro areas analyzed by Zillow.

“It’s good to see overall inventory rising. It’s likely that many would-be sellers have decided to capitalize on recent home value gains, particularly as the pace slows, and list their home for sale now in order to move into a new home while mortgage interest rates remain low,” said Zillow chief economist Stan Humphries. “But persistent inventory constraints at the low end of the market continue to make it a tough environment for first-time and lower-income homebuyers. Low inventory and high demand can lead to rapid price spikes, which make homes even more difficult to afford for many buyers. Hopefully the inventory gains we’re seeing in the middle and upper tiers of the market will begin trickling down to the most affordable homes soon.”

The total number of homes listed for sale on Zillow in May was up 4.3% over April, and has risen month-over-month in each of the past three months on a seasonally adjusted basis.

Here’s a look at the breakdown by city. Click the image below to see the chart.

Overall inventory of for-sale homes was up year-over-year in 506 (78%) of the more than 600 metro areas analyzed by Zillow. Large metros where inventory has increased the most include Las Vegas (up 51.5% year-over-year), Washington, DC (up 45.7% year-over-year) and Riverside, Calif. (up 42.7% year-over-year).

In addition to low numbers of affordable homes for sale, first-time and lower-income homebuyers armed with traditional financing are also competing with all-cash buyers at the lower end of the market. Zillow reported last week that in 27 of the top 30 metros analyzed by Zillow, more than one third of all sales of the lowest-priced homes were made with cash. In three of the top 30 metros – Tampa, Detroit and Miami – more than 80% of all sales in the lowest price bracket were cash deals.

National home values in May were up 0.1% from April to a Zillow Home Value Index of $172,300, and have now risen for 28 consecutive months.

Year-over-year, U.S. home values rose 5.4% in May, the slowest annual pace of appreciation in more than a year. For the 12-month period from May 2014 to May 2015, national home values are expected to rise another 2.9% to approximately $177,321, according to the Zillow Home Value Forecast.

June 23, 2014 12:01AM – http://www.housingwire.com/articles/30393-housing-inventory-jumps-118-but-first-time-buyers-still-locked-out.
Come back tomorrow to www.AshfordCP.com/blog  where Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

Bay Area’s Population Boom is a Bust for Housing Market

Population Boom a Bust for Housing Market

Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

Commuters wait in traffic on Interstate 80 and 580 on approach to the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge Monday, July 1, 2013, in Oakland, Calif.

When Donna Arthur-Rosa and her husband Chris found out they were expecting their first child, the couple knew it was time to give up their one-bedroom apartment in San Francisco’s Noe Valley neighborhood. They didn’t expect that their search for a bigger living space would  end nearly 30 miles from the city they called home for over 18 years.

“It’s hard because I don’t think of ourselves as poor,” said Arthur-Rosa, who works as a product manager for a footwear company in the East Bay. “San Francisco to us is our home, which makes it really sad because we can’t afford it. It’s the place we identify with.”

For Arthur-Rosa and her husband, a two-bedroom apartment in the city would have cost three times what they were paying for their $1,100-per-month rent-controlled apartment, she said. It was more affordable to have a mortgage outside of the city than to rent in San Francisco. So after a year-and-a-half of house hunting, the couple and their now-20-month-old daughter settled in Novato, a city in Marin County.

Thanks to Silicon Valley’s job boom, the population in the Bay Area has skyrocketed and the influx of residents have economists and real estate experts worried about what it means for the region’s housing supply and transportation infrastructure. The Bay Area has the state’s fastest growing population, according to a report released last month by the Department of Finance.

Santa Clara County, the heart of Silicon Valley, grew at a 1.5 percent rate in 2013, the highest spike in California. Workers are flocking to the region because it boasts one of the country’s lowest unemployment rates and most satisfied workers, but now there is a shortage of homes to buy and those that are available have become prohibitively expensive. The Bay Area tops the list of the least affordable homes in the state, according to the California Association of Realtors.

The population for each of the Bay Area’s nine counties has grown steadily each year since 2000. A few counties experienced a decline in the mid-2000s in the wake of the dotcom bust, but the overall population is on the rise, according to Bill Schooling, the Department of Finance’s chief of demographic research. And there’s no secret as to what’s contributing to the boom.

“Job growth has been an important part of it,” Schooling said. “A lot of people overseas and domestically want to live in the Bay Area.”

But the housing supply hasn’t kept pace with the surging economy and rising population. San Francisco took on 10,617 new residents in 2013, but added only 2,277 new housing units. Santa Clara added 5,245 new units for over 27,600 newcomers. And Alameda added 2,474 new units for 23,135 new arrivals, according to the Department of Finance’s report. These supply gaps repeat itself throughout most of the nine counties.

There are simply not enough homes to go around, and the Rosas experienced this first hand. Novato was not their first choice, Arthur-Rosa said. They wanted to live somewhere with all the trappings of an urban lifestyle: restaurants, culture, close proximity to friends. This means Oakland and Berkeley are more their speed.

“Finding a place to purchase was another bear unto itself.” Arthur-Rosa said. “We were putting in multiple bids and getting priced out by cash offers.”

Reports of bidding wars have emerged throughout the area. Some homes have attracted nearly 30 offers, with buyers paying hundreds of thousands of dollars over the asking price, according to the Mercury-News.

Arthur-Rosa, 37, grew up in Petaluma, about an hour outside of San Francisco. She said she’s watched the Bay Area and the city change in a way that has alienated locals and those she calls “creative types.” Everywhere she looked, she saw single family homes converted into condos.

“There used to be a lot of affordable dining and now there is just a lot of shi-shi restaurants,” she said. “It’s just crowded all the time and you can’t get anywhere.”

There doesn’t seem to be any relief in sight. Earlier this year, the Mercury News reported that the Bay Area’s astronomical home prices are having a spillover effect to neighboring San Joaquin, Stanislaus and San Benito counties. Home prices in these counties are now rising as a result, but are still substantially more affordable than living in San Francisco, Oakland or San Jose, the report said.

The median price paid for a home in the nine-county Bay Area went up in April to a new post-recession high of $610,000, according to a report by DataQuick, a San Diego-based real estate information service. That’s 5.4 percent higher than it was in March, and 20 percent higher than it was in April of last year. San Jose and San Francisco, the Bay Area’s two metropolitan areas, have the highest median home prices in the nation, according to online real estate database Zillow.com.

“We haven’t been planning well for population growth,” said Jim Wunderman, CEO of the Bay Area Council, a network of the Bay Area’s 275 biggest employers including Facebook, Apple and Google. “It’s going to push housing prices up, which has the effect of eliminating the middle class and working families from the neighborhood they grew up in.”

San Francisco native Edgar Japitana is also feeling pushed out of the city he calls home.

“I want to buy, but it’s too expensive,” said Japitana. “If I do buy, I’d probably have to go somewhere in the East Bay or the Peninsula.”

Until then, the 29-year-old engineer said he is confined to a $2,500-a-month two-bedroom apartment in the city’s Richmond District, which he shares with a roommate. He said he “got lucky” because the apartment is rent controlled. He thinks the market rate for the apartment is at least $500 higher.

The population boom is prompting policymakers to think about how future housing development occurs. Experts say new homes should be built along transit lines to encourage the use of public transportation and give the overburdened roads a break.

There has been a 2 percent increase in vehicle traffic across all seven state-owned toll bridges in the area. This is the third straight year of growth and the increase seems to be accelerating, according to John Goodwin, a spokesperson at the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. BART and Muni are also setting passenger records, he said. Caltrain’s preliminary numbers for 2014 show an 11.8 percent increase in ridership.

“The biggest challenge for policymakers right now is ensuring that people can afford to live in the Bay Area and move around,” said Ratna Amin, Transportation Policy Director at SPUR, a Bay Area think tank.

Amin points to a long-term plan that officials adopted last summer to drive housing development towards urban areas near mass transit systems to stymie suburban sprawl. The MTC and the Association of Bay Area Governments approved Plan Bay Area to put most of the 2 million additional people expected to move to the region in the next three decades near public transportation.

“We need to focus on building more compact communities where people can walk, bike, or take transit systems for more of their trips instead of building more highways,” Amin said.

Real estate experts agree.

“It has to happen,” said Paul Desmet, President of The Ryness Company, a Bay Area-based sales and marketing company for new home developers. “You can’t keep people on freeways in bumper-to-bumper traffic for two hours every day.”

The plan aims to direct 77 percent of future growth to areas like downtown San Rafael, Walnut Creek, Fairfield, and Suisun City’s waterfront — where homes are walking distance from shopping, dining, recreation and public transportation — with grant money for affordable and high-density housing. Homes prices are currently 10 to 20 percent higher near the Walnut Creek BART station, Desmet said.

“It’s a tight market and they can’t build a lot,” said Andrew LePage, an analyst at DataQuick. “There’s not a lot of vacant land left, so developers have to start going vertical.”

But the plan is not perfect. Most of the transportation money in Plan Bay Area is earmarked for maintenance alone and there is still a $20 billion shortfall needed to keep the region’s transit systems in good repair for the next 30 years. Ensuring that BART, Caltrain, Muni and other systems can accommodate more riders will require even more funding.

Most Bay Area residents agree that the region’s housing and transportation problems need to be dealt with immediately. A recent poll by the Bay Area Council shows that of the 1,000 people interviewed, over 75 percent say that the region is in the grip of a housing cost crisis, while 71 percent say that traffic congestion has reached a crisis stage.

Japitana is part of that majority and is no stranger to a Bay Area commute besieged by gridlock. He said he sits in traffic for nearly two-hours each day to travel the 40 miles from his apartment to Palo Alto where his company is based. Japitana says he drives, but on some days he prefers public transportation.

“I can save some money on gas, but more importantly it saves time and I don’t have to deal with traffic and the hassle of commuting,” Japitana said.

Japitana said his employer reimburses him for 50 percent of his public transportation costs, which comes out to about $260 a month for bus and BART fare.

The practice of ferrying employees to work is not new. Silicon Valley’s tech giants Facebook, Google and Apple have been using San Francisco’s bus and railway stops as pickup locations for shuttle services that takes their employees to work, sometimes as far as 50 miles away.

But last month, activists took the city to task with a lawsuit because Muni approved an 18-month pilot program in January to charge tech companies $1 per stop starting in July. The plaintiffs claim that it is illegal for private vehicles to use public bus stops.

“I think it’s crazy to sue the tech companies,” Wunderman said. “These buses are keeping people off the road who would otherwise be driving cars.”

Author: An Phung – http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Bay-Areas-Population-Boom-a-Burden-on-Transportation-and-Housing-260805031.html

Come back tomorrow to www.AshfordCP.com/blog  where Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

Builders Salute Military Buyers

In military towns across the U.S., savvy builders are enticing service members to put down roots.

Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

The sales team at Desert View Homes’ El Paso, Texas, office knows how to make service members from nearby Fort Bliss feel welcome, and it shows in their sales numbers. As much as 30 percent of the company’s closings come from military buyers or civilians who work on the 1,700-square-mile U.S. Army base.

The production builder, which also operates a Colorado division near Fort Carson, pays all closing costs for military buyers and offers a 1 percent discount on the cost of their home or a 1 percent bonus in additional upgrades. These monetary incentives are designed to entice service members out of base housing and into homeownership, many for the first time, says Desert View senior vice president Pat Woods.

The company builds most of its houses on spec to have a large supply of homes available for quick move-in—a perk for service members who want to avoid moving their families into temporary housing while waiting for a new home to be constructed. Desert View also offers buyers a free one-year home warranty, plus two years on systems and 10 years structural. The company’s reputation for service after the sale eases the mind of service members concerned about who will help maintain their home when they are deployed.

“If the air conditioner isn’t working and the wife is home with two kids while the husband is deployed, he wants to know you’re a builder that will jump to take care of it,” Woods says.

At Saint Aubyn Homes’ Colorado Springs, Colo., office, where active or retired military members generate 90 percent of its 400 annual closings, salespeople enlist hefty incentives to get buyers in the door. For homes priced at $200,000 or less, buyers receive $10,000 for closing costs and/or upgrades such as garage door remote controls or washers and dryers. For homes costing more than $200,000, buyers receive $12,500.

Proud buyers at Saint Aubyn Homes' Meridian Ranch community.

Proud buyers at Saint Aubyn Homes’ Meridian Ranch community.

These programs not only get the attention of potential customers, they also make purchasing a new home more attractive than an existing one, points out sales and marketing director Tammie Leachman.

Like Desert View, Saint Aubyn also maintains a large inventory. In fact, at least 60 percent of the company’s homes are built on spec to accommodate military buyers who want to close in 30 days or less, Leachman says.

Service members make attractive buyers because of their access to 100 percent financing through government-backed VA mortgages, she adds. “The average young soldier has a good income for meeting his monthly payments but generally doesn’t have anything saved for a down payment, and that’s the beauty of a VA loan,” Leachman says.

Nabbing military buyers can require extra legwork. Many times, they are shopping for a home from another state or even from out of the country so salespeople must get creative with photos, video, and email. At Saint Aubyn, sales staff provide real-time walkthroughs via FaceTime or Skype.

In addition, a no-nonsense approach is required for this demographic, which is turned off by marketing lingo and elaborate deals. “As they say in the military, ‘Minimize the minutiae,’” says marketing expert Mollie Elkman. “Don’t sugarcoat the message.”

Once a builder pleases one service member customer, others will not be far behind. “They rely strongly on word of mouth for purchasing decisions,” Woods says of military home buyers. “If the command sergeant major buys a home from you and he’s happy with you, he’s telling all of his soldiers, ‘Hey, these are good guys.’”

Come back tomorrow to www.AshfordCP.com/blog  where Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

Who Wouldn’t Take a Slight Improvement in Home Starts Over Last Year?

Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

Monthly figures on U.S. home-construction starts make the industry appear bipolar: down significantly in March, up big in April and down again in May.

The reality is, when the focus is broadened to the first five months of this year, home starts have exceeded last year’s tally, although the growth has slowed considerably.

Tuesday’s headlines noted that housing starts in May were 6.5% less than a month earlier. However, the Census’ monthly figures are subject to volatility and substantial revisions. You can get a more reliable picture at this point by examining year-to-date figures, which include most of the spring season.

Consider that, for the first five months of this year, builders started 396,000 dwelling units, not adjusted for seasonality. That’s up 6.6% from the same period last year.

Factoring out the fast-growing multifamily sector, you still get a 2.5% increase in single-family home starts in this year’s first five months (255,600) over the same period of 2013 (249,300).

“When we look over several months to smooth out that volatility, construction clearly is recovering, especially on the multiunit side,” said Jed Kolko, chief economist for real-estate website Trulia TRLA -0.60%, referring to apartments and condominiums.

Mr. Kolko added that, over the past three months, construction starts for both multifamily and single-family exceed the year-ago tally by 10%.

The reasons that the new-home market has slowed to smaller gains this year from rather strong gains last year are well chronicled. Chief among them are rising home prices and interest rates. Even so, many analysts still forecast gains in starts and sales for this year.

“I still maintain my belief that we’re going to have continued increases in housing starts on a trend basis through the rest of this year and into next year,” said Brad Hunter, chief economist for home-building research firm Metrostudy, part of Hanley Wood LLC.

Metrostudy forecasts one million home starts for 2014, an increase of nearly 9% from 2013.

Scott Laurie, president and chief executive of Southern California home builder Olson Co., anticipates selling 30% more homes this year than last year. However, much of that is due to the builder starting new projects. On a per-community basis, which is akin to retailers measuring sales at individual stores against their year-ago numbers, the builder’s sales are flat with its totals from last year.

“For us, the best way to quantify it is that we’re doing just as well as we did last year,” Mr. Laurie said. “And last year was a very good year.”

Author:  Kris Hudson http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2014/06/17/despite-volatility-new-home-starts-this-year-surpass-year-ago-figures/

Come back tomorrow to www.AshfordCP.com/blog  where Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

May Housing Scorecard Shows Progress in Equity and Home Sales

May Housing Scorecard Shows Progress in Equity and Home Sales

Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury released the May edition of the Obama Administration’s Housing Scorecard on Friday. The government report showed progress, noting growth in key indicators such as increasing equity and a rebound in the sale of new and existing homes.

According to the Federal Reserve, homeowner equity was up nearly $795 billion in Q1 2014, totaling more than $10.8 trillion. May’s figure was the highest level since the second quarter of 2007. Equity has continued to rise since the beginning of 2012, up 73 percent (nearly $4.6 trillion) through the first quarter of 2014.

“May’s Housing Scorecard shows that the housing market recovery is picking up after the harsh winter months,” said HUD assistant secretary, Katherine O’Regan. “More homeowners have positive equity, foreclosures continue their downward trend, and sales of new and existing homes are rebounding. While these are all good signs, it’s clear that we must remain committed to helping homeowners as they recover from the worst housing recession since the Great Depression.”

HUD cited figures from CoreLogic, which found that the number of underwater borrowers dropped 48 percent, lifting more than 5.8 million homeowners above water from 2012 to the first quarter of 2014. Despite first quarter gains of 300,000 homeowners who returned to positions of positive equity, approximately 12.7 percent of residential properties with a mortgage are still underwater.

HUD also celebrated new home sales, which were up 6.4 percent to 433,000 in April. Foreclosure starts continued on a downward slope, down 10 percent from the previous month and down 32 percent year-over-year. Foreclosures are the lowest they have been since December 2005.

Existing-home sales rose for the first this year. HUD cited a National Association of Realtors report that found existing home sales sold at a seasonally adjusted annual rate (SAAR) of 4.65 million in April, up 1.3 percent from March. However, existing-home sales are still 6.8 percent below the 4.99 million pace seen a year earlier.

“The standards set by the Making Home Affordable program have significantly changed the mortgage servicing industry,” said Treasury Acting Assistant Secretary Tim Bowler. “Treasury is committed to holding servicers accountable to these standards, and as a result has seen continued improvement by the largest servicers.”

HUD noted that foreclosure mitigation programs continue to provide relief for distressed homeowners—more than 8.3 million mortgage modification and other homeowner assistance actions were completed between April 2009 and April 2014.

HUD commented, “More than 2.0 million homeowner assistance actions have taken place through the Making Home Affordable Program, including nearly 1.4 million permanent modifications through the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), while the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) has offered 2.3 million loss mitigation and early delinquency interventions through April.”

Author: Colin Robins June 13, 2014 – http://dsnews.com/news/06-13-2014/may-housing-scorecard-shows-progress-equity-home-sales

Come back tomorrow to www.AshfordCP.com/blog  where Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

mriedemann

Study: Road to Housing Recovery will be ‘Longer and Bumpier’

Study: Road to Housing Recovery will be ‘Longer and Bumpier’

Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.
—-
The Wells Fargo Economics Group released its Housing Chartbook for May 2014. The group found that most markets are finding themselves “wildly out of balance” from inflated home prices driven by investor purchases, as well as exceptionally tight inventories that are well ahead of any improvement in demand.

The group said that the “lack of a rebound in home sales this spring has reinforced our view that there was more than harsh winter weather behind the recent slide in home sales and mortgage applications.” The group notes that the road to housing recovery will be longer—and much bumpier—than expected.

Housing demand is still reeling from last spring’s spike in mortgage rates. The Wells Fargo Economics Group commented that a 70-basis point rise in mortgage rates coupled with a 6.2 percent rise in prices resulted in a 17.1 percent jump in monthly principal and interest payments. Payments on an existing home, irrespective of a slight dip in home prices, have risen 11.9 percent. Consumer confidence in purchasing a new home within six months fell in May to 4.9 percent, below the 12-month moving average of 5.7 percent.

Overall economic growth will also hamper housing growth, according to the group from Wells Fargo. Real GDP is expected to rise just 2.0 percent in 2014, with new home sales and single-family housing starts expected to rise much more slowly. The group forecasts that new home sales will climb 8.4 percent to 465,000 units, while single-family housing starts will climb 10.9 percent. New home prices will moderate, rising just 2.6 percent to $276,000 in 2014.

Refinancing activity is also expected to slow down. “The refinancing share of mortgage activity rose to 52.2 percent, up from 48.7 in early May, which was the lowest share since July 2009. Recent gains in refinancing activity are not sustainable, however, as rates will eventually increase,” the group said. Mortgage applications also are down, falling in five of the past six weeks.

Housing starts continued to improve, rising for the third consecutive month in April and nearly offsetting the December and January weather-related drop. The improvement might be short-lived, however, as the level of permits is running well below starts. Permits rose just 0.3 percent in April, which will restrain future completions, further limiting inventory and exacerbating problems with affordability.

Existing home sales rallied slightly in April, up 1.3 percent after three consecutive months of decline. Distressed sales accounted for 15 percent of activity and all-cash transactions edged slightly higher to 18 percent. First-time home buyers have risen from recent lows, but remain well short of long-term trends. Easing of credit conditions and inventory remain the key factors for near-term sales, but the group doesn’t believe that credit conditions will ease up in the coming months.

Author: Colin Robins June 11, 2014 – http://dsnews.com/news/06-11-2014/study-road-housing-recovery-will-longer-bumpier?utm_source=DS+Weekly&utm_campaign=d687c603bb-DS_Weekly&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cc3ebd2b74-d687c603bb-175429429

Come back tomorrow to www.AshfordCP.com/blog  where Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

new-home-construction

 

Where are Baby Boomers moving? Absolutely nowhere

3 reasons why they are staying put

rocking chair

Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

Some 10,000 Baby Boomers reach retirement every day, exiting a world dependent on jobs and kids and into a new lifestyle that drastically adjusts their housing choices, a commentary by Patrick Simmons, director with the Economic and Strategic Research Group of Fannie Mae, said.

The common perception is that the generation born between 1946 and 1964 is starting to downsize from suburban single-family homes to urban multifamily residences as they become empty nesters.

But this assumption is not true, and in fact, the truth is quite the opposite.

Simmons explained, “Despite these life transitions, one key metric of boomer housing consumption – the proportion of the population residing in a single-family detached home – has yet to decline.”

And instead of the downsizing perception, the percent of Baby Boomers residing in single-family detached homes was at least as high in 2012 as at any time since the onset of the housing crisis.

This trend even includes the oldest members of the boomer generation, who have largely exited the childrearing stage and begun to retire in large numbers.

Between 2006 and 2012, the proportion of leading-edge boomer households consisting of a married couple with at least one child under age 18 significantly fell from 10% to a mere 3%.

And younger boomers are posting much of the same numbers, with the share of nuclear families among this group declining from 35% to 20%.

As a whole, the number of traditional family households dropped by more than 5 million between 2006 and 2012 for boomers.

(source: Fannie Mae, click image for larger view)

Baby Boomers

Furthermore, boomers are increasingly stepping away from the workforce. Between 2006 and 2012, the proportion of all boomers who were not in the labor force increased by 9 percentage points.

But despite all these variables, this generation is not leaving their detached single-family homes, but  why?

1. They could simply love their current home.

According to a survey by AARP in 2010, nearly nine in 10 Baby Boomers prefer to remain in their current residences for as long as possible.

2. Economic conditions and housing conditions force Baby Boomers to stay put.

From 2006 to 2012, the average value of an owner-occupied single-family detached home with a boomer householder declined by 13%. Even more, the decline in home values means that they are in a negative equity position on their mortgage, making it difficult to sell the home and move. And for those without a home underwater, they might want to still wait to recoup more of their home’s former value.

3. They might not be able to find a home to buy.

It is also a concern that if they wish to sell, they might have a hard time finding buyers for their existing homes or they might face an inadequate supply of homes to purchase should they choose to stay owner-occupants. Between 2006 and 2012, the percent of boomer householders who moved during the preceding year dropped from 10.2% to 7.9%.

“The stability in single-family detached occupancy among Baby Boomers will eventually come to an end, if not by boomers’ choice, then as a consequence of advancing age or mortality that would make it difficult or impossible to maintain a single-family home,” the commentary said.

It is important to note that the commentary is using data available only through 2012, so the trends might miss more recent changes in boomer housing behavior in response to the continued recovery of the housing market and economy.

Still curious? The next issue of HousingWire’s Magazine will feature more on Baby Boomers.  Click here for more information.

Come back tomorrow to www.AshfordCP.com/blog  where Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

Survey: Consumers Expect Home Prices to Increase

Survey: Consumers Expect Home Prices to Increase

Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York released its latest Survey of Consumer Expectations for June 2014. The survey found that consumers expect home prices to accelerate in every region except one—the South—where a slight slowdown is expected.

Overall, consumers expected home prices to increase in May by 4.0 percent, up slightly from April’s reading of 3.77 percent. The West saw the largest month-over-month jump in regional home price expectations, up to 5.53 percent in May from April’s reading of 5.02 percent. The Midwest and Northeast saw small increases as well, from 3.05 percent to 3.13 percent in the Midwest and 3.02 percent to 3.10 percent in the Northeast.

Home price expectations for the South declined from April’s reading of 4.0 percent to 3.93 percent in May.

Respondents also said that the mean probability of finding a job in the next three months if they were to lose their jobs today was 48.7 percent, up slightly from April’s reading of 46.57 percent.

The New York Fed’s survey also reported on debt delinquency. The probability of respondents who said they would not be able to make minimum debt payments over the next three months was roughly 14 percent, down slightly from April’s reading.

Respondents to the survey felt that the one-year ahead expected inflation rate would be 3.17 percent, down slightly from April’s reading of 3.3 percent.

Finally, 31.67 percent of those surveyed believe credit availability would be “somewhat harder” in the coming year, with 8.39 percent who believe that gaining credit would be “much harder.” Roughly 41 percent of survey respondents said credit availability would be “equally easy/hard.” Approximately 19 percent believe credit will be “somewhat easier” to “much easier” to get in the coming year.

Author: Colin Robins June 9, 2014 0 – http://dsnews.com/news/06-09-2014/survey-consumers-expect-home-prices-increase

Come back tomorrow to www.AshfordCP.com/blog  where Kennesaw’s Ashford Capital Partners’ Managing Partners Matthew Riedemann brings you news you can use.